Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 064
Original file (2013 064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-064

NAME

CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKQ,
Misconduct, RE4

BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

 

     
     

 

 

[ TIS 7 yrs, 8 months, 27 days
Policy Implications None

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged in 2013 for Misconduct due to disobeying orders and impeding an investigation.

While serving as part of the permanent party training staff, the applicant pursued prohibited romantic
relationships with several women from the summer of 2011 to the Fall of 2012. This was in violation of the
Standard Operating Procedures for the Training Center by dating recent graduates of recruit training.
Additionally, as a married service member, the applicant committed adultery on diverse occasions, and
attempted to wrongfully endeavor to impede an investigation by requesting that the love interests not disclose
their interactions to Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) agents.

The applicant is asking that the board look at the entirety of service time with regard to the Character of Service
that was issued. The board notes that the behavior over the aforementioned 16 month period was in alignment

with a Summary Court Martial and serious military offense. Therefore, the SPD code and Character of Service
were properly issued.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 017

    Original file (2014 017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-017 Under Honorable Conditions, |-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 [-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 Honorable None None TIS Policy Implications 4 yrs, | month, 8 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2012. The actions that led to the Discharge included Adultery with an officer’s wife, sending racially offensive texts to the other parent of their children (also a CG mbr), attempting to...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 066

    Original file (2013 066.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-066 TIS 1 yrs, 3 months, 13 days | Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs in 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Coast Guard has zero tolerance for drug abuse, the character of service and separation issued is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 016

    Original file (2013 016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable. The appropriate character of service is “Under Honorable Conditions,” therefore the Board recommends an administrative change to the applicant’s record to reflect “Under Honorable Conditions.” Propriety: Discharge was proper.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 046

    Original file (2013 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per ALCOAST 605/10, the use of spice was specified as illegal for all Coast Guard members. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012

    Original file (2013 012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 083

    Original file (2012 083.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the provisions of an Administrative investigation, “the consent of the member is not required to collect a specimen... the scope of the inspection may include all personnel of the unit or only a part of the unit; e.g., a duty section, a division, the occupants of a building, etc.” The provisions regarding to the administrative inspection involve the mechanism for collection. In the case of the applicant, beyond the standard urinalysis the specimen was selected for additional steroid...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047

    Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 046

    Original file (2014 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 006

    Original file (2013 006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record, Summary Courts-Martial, Pretrial Agreement, and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The applicant (and attorney brief) states that the victims were reciprocal in the physical contact, text messages, and sexual nature initiated by the applicant. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity on the merits of this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 059

    Original file (2013 059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. In accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post- separation policy.